×
Announcements (24 Feb 2017)

New users: Note that user registration is temporarily disabled due to recent high influx of bogus registrations. User registration may be enabled again in the future. In the meantime, if you wish to register, please contact the website administrator.

Disclaimer: The purpose of this forum is to collect comments and suggestions for the upcoming revision of Eurocode 8. SECED does not assume any liability for any posts or comments placed in the forum by its users.

This sub-forum is dedicated to the chapters of EC 8 Part 1 not relating to design issues for specific materials (i.e. Chapter 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10). Chapters 5 through 9 are covered in the other sub-forum on EC8 Part 1 . These chapters of EC8 are generally applicable to all building design, and are also referred to by non-building parts of EC8.

The forum is open for comment on any aspect of these chapters of EC8. Some potential topics of interest would be:

a) Definition of "low seismicity" and "very low seismicity" (3.2.1)
Are the hazard levels identified for low and very low seismicity appropriate? Are the requirements for low seismicity regions adequate?

b) Performance requirements (Chapter 2)
Are the performance requirements adequate for modern design? Do they meet the needs of all stakeholders (not just engineers)? Do the design rules give designs that would meet the requirements? Are importance factors adequate for reliability differentiation of higher (or lower) consequence buildings? Do the DCL/DCM/DCH distinctions represent a good balance between practical application, cost of resulting designs, and seismic risk?

c) Seismic actions (Chapter 3)
Is the design spectrum given in EC8 the best way to present the seismic action? Are the rules for time-history representation (3.2.3.1) sufficient, now that time history analysis is becoming more accessible to engineers (especially for complex structures)?

d) Base isolation (Chapter 10)
At the very least these should be made consistent with Eurocode 8 Part 2 (for bridges). Should we also aim to introduce requirements for supplemental damping (explicitly excluded from the scope of Chapter 10 by cl. 10.1(4))?

Damian Grant
Subject Replies / Views Last Post
Topic started 2 years 5 months ago, by Edmund Booth
Last Post 2 years 5 months ago
by Edmund Booth
Replies:0
Views:636
Last Post by Edmund Booth
2 years 5 months ago
Topic started 2 years 10 months ago, by Chris Rogers
Last Post 2 years 5 months ago
by Andreas Nielsen
Replies:11
Views:3432
Last Post by Andreas Nielsen
2 years 5 months ago
Topic started 2 years 7 months ago, by Andreas Nielsen
Last Post 2 years 7 months ago
by Andreas Nielsen
Replies:0
Views:437
Last Post by Andreas Nielsen
2 years 7 months ago
Topic started 2 years 7 months ago, by Andreas Nielsen
Last Post 2 years 7 months ago
by Andreas Nielsen
Replies:0
Views:436
Last Post by Andreas Nielsen
2 years 7 months ago
Topic started 2 years 10 months ago, by Milutin Srbulov
Last Post 2 years 7 months ago
by Rory McCully
Replies:3
Views:2752
Last Post by Rory McCully
2 years 7 months ago
Topic started 2 years 10 months ago, by Chris Rogers
Last Post 2 years 9 months ago
by Chris Rogers
Replies:2
Views:958
Last Post by Chris Rogers
2 years 9 months ago
Topic started 2 years 9 months ago, by Damian Grant
Last Post 2 years 9 months ago
by Andrew Mole
Replies:1
Views:1154
Last Post by Andrew Mole
2 years 9 months ago
Topic started 2 years 9 months ago, by Andreas Nielsen
Last Post 2 years 9 months ago
by Damian Grant
Replies:1
Views:777
Last Post by Damian Grant
2 years 9 months ago
Time to create page: 0.176 seconds
Go to top